TAKE 1: One Man’s Opinion
…because
film is largely subjective
by Frederick William Springer
III
Django Unchained
Release Date: 25 December 2012 Runtime:
165 Minutes
Review Date: 17 March 2013 Rating: 4 (of 6)
Django
Unchained is a well put together, enjoyable tale with a good pace, though
there are certainly cuts that could have been made to fine tune it still.
Here, my faith in
Samuel L. Jackson’s ability to act has been restored. His brief appearances in the Marvel movies
culminating in a main role in The
Avengers all fell flat to me. Worse
than flat—phony.
I’ll go on record
saying I don’t like Jonah Hill.
Fortunately, his role is brief, limited to what’s in the trailer, so his
presence didn’t taint the rest of the film.
Conversely, I am a fan of Amber Tamblyn and would have liked to have
seen more of her rather than a momentary appearance in a window which left me
asking if I had, in fact, just seen her.
I’m also a big fan of Kerry Washington, her work in Scandal spectacular, and I wouldn’t have minded seeing more of her onscreen,
too. However, understandably, this movie
is named Django not Broomhilda.
There are a
couple scenes with a woman seemingly dressed to conceal the fact that she is a
woman, appearing as though it would be the setup of some future plot twist but
nothing ever came of it or her.
I think the
controversy, largely propagated by those that never even saw the film (and so
were ignorant as to what occurred), was completely misplaced. Django
Unchained in no way, shape or form glorified slavery. In fact, its depiction of the slave trade,
those that supported and perpetrated it, is deplorable and apprehensible. As for the use of the word “nigger,” this is
a period piece and that is how people spoke at the time, especially slave
owners and overseers. I didn’t feel it
was used gratuitously or lightly.
No comments:
Post a Comment