TAKE 1: One Man’s Opinion
…because
film is largely subjective
by Frederick William Springer
III
Taken 2
Release Date: 5 October
2012 Runtime:
93 Minutes
Review Date: 9 December 2012 Rating: 5 (of 6)
As a sequel, Taken 2
is pretty decent, though not as good as the original. I had been skeptical going in, to retread the
premise of the first without making it seem totally unbelievable was a concern
I entered with. It was a concern I need
not have.
My gripe comes in the small details. In the first film, Kim (Maggie Grace) had
just turned 17 and shortly thereafter left for Paris on summer vacation. This film ultimately takes place almost a
year later during her spring break—I say “ultimately” as the opening, setting
up the plot of this film, shows the bodies of the men Bryan (Liam Neeson)
killed in the first film being shipped home and buried as revenge is vowed and
I’m sure it didn’t take that long after the first film took place for that to
transpire.
The problem here is that Kimmie is just going for her
driver’s license NOW. For one,
California residents can get their license at 16. From the first film, we know Kimmie lives
with her wealthy step-father who showers her with expensive things—a life of
luxury. So, why then didn’t she get her
license back then, she nearly being 18 now?
And why wouldn’t she have her very own car, too?
That aside, the driving issue rears its head again while
they’re in Turkey. Early in the film
it’s established that Kimmie has now twice failed her driving test, which she
was taking in an Escalade. Yet, when
called for, she’s not only driving a car through the narrow roads in Turkey,
avoiding many obstacles as though she were an experienced driver but the car is
MANUAL! While they don’t actually show
her shifting gears, the numbers on the stick along with the three pedals on the
floor establish that it’s manual transmission.
If she couldn’t pass her driving test, TWICE, how does she automatically
know how to drive manual?
An otherwise good film, my mind just kept coming back to
this and doing laps, distracting me from the unfolding story. I guess the film is tailored more for the
ignorant and unobservant.
Conveniently, Bryan’s ex Lenore (Famke Janssen) is going
through a rough patch and separated from her husband, however, all indication
in the first film was that there were no problems and they were happy. The separation didn’t bother me though, it
was the instant familiarity Bryan had with her, calling her “honey” several
times when she arrived for a completely platonic vacation with their daughter. Yes, we get his character still loves her but
also know the distance that had come between them and while one could pass it
off as him easily falling into old patterns, that’s not something I’ve come to
expect from his very disciplined character.
Other than that, the story itself was good and the fast
paced editing did help move us past these oversights. Well, those of us that weren’t “like a dog
with a bone” once we noticed.
No comments:
Post a Comment