TAKE 1: One Man’s Opinion
…because
film is largely subjective
Avengers: Age of Ultron
Release Date: 1 May 2015 Runtime: 141 Minutes
Review Date: 7 July 2015 Rating: 4 (of 6)
If you want your
audience to feel as though it's witnessing someone else playing a video game
rather than watching a movie, than, by all means, load the first couple minutes
of your film with as much CGI as Avengers:
Age of Ultron.
Past that, this
installment was generally better than the last because it actually had a
feasible plot--the team falling for Loki's transparent trap last time around
absurd. But, at the same time, we feel
the absence of Loki's fun character.
Another missing element that had worked in the last was the playful give
and take between Stark and Banner, present only in a diminished capacity here.
Writer/Director
Joss Whedon was able to nicely weave in cameos by other characters from each of
the standalone films--Iron Man, Thor, and Captain America--which was a nice touch, tying them altogether
beyond just involving the titular characters. However, even though we did dig just a little
deeper into some of the characters this time round, particularly with Hawkeye
and Black Widow, and even with Samuel Jackson finally bringing his A-game after
underwhelming and unconvincing performances in the others pictures in the
Marvel Cinematic Universe, the piece as a whole still felt a little flat.
(As a side note
that may be of interest to some, I saw the original Avengers a month before I started writing movie reviews. I immediately thereafter mused that I should
have begun earlier with that film, as I had a lot to say about it at the time,
mostly negative observations. I have
since lightly ribbed it in 7 other reviews over the past 3 years, still not
fully covering my distain but at least broaching it. Here's a taste:
"The Dark Knight Rises delivers where Avengers did not--story."
"If I could
only pick one superhero movie to see this summer, it would still be The Dark Knight Rises but in a distant
second, I just might pick The Amazing
Spider-Man over the overrated Avengers."
In Robocop,
"...Samuel Jackson's Pat Novak, a satire of cable personalities purporting
to represent the news, falls flat just as his Nick Fury does in all the Marvel
movies, particularly in The Avengers."
"I will say
that 3D technology has seemingly improved over the past year, the action
sequences in The Avengers (which were
a large part of that movie) blurry and hard to follow, whereas here [G.I. Joe: Retaliation] they are more
crisp and clean (but not quite perfected yet)."
"I can also
say it's more enjoyable watching Loki (Tom Hiddleston) here [Thor: The Dark World] than it was in The Avengers."
"Here [Django Unchained], my faith in Samuel L.
Jackson’s ability to act has been restored.
His brief appearances in the Marvel movies culminating in a main role in
The Avengers all fell flat to
me. Worse than flat—phony."
And, "Iron Man 3 returned the franchise (and Marvel)
to the quality level it should be, surpassing the misfire that was Iron Man 2 (as well as The Avengers--I didn't get on that
bandwagon, thought it was pretty bad--and Captain
America for that matter, too--the worst in the whole series).")