Sunday, October 14, 2012

The Expendables 2


TAKE 1: One Mans Opinion

…because film is largely subjective

 

by Frederick William Springer III


The Expendables 2
Release Date:  17 August 2012                                                             Runtime:  103 Minutes              
Review Date:  14 October 2012                                                             Rating:  4 (of 6)


     If you're into action movies, and some of the biggest names in the genre, then you might enjoy yourself at The Expendables 2.

     I must say, I liked the sequel more than the original.  Why that is could be a combination of many factors.  Of all the stars in the original, Bruce Willis (Church) would have been the lure to get me into the theater but there he's limited to a one scene cameo alongside Arnold Schwarzenegger's Trench's also one scene, even briefer cameo.  Here, Willis's role is slightly expanded--since he is CIA and not a member of the Expendables team, he only has limited screen time.

     Introduced in this film, Chuck Norris makes a guest appearance as the lone wolf mercenary Booker.  Like Willis and Schwarzenegger, his time is short (but poignant), which is a shame because I wouldn't mind a movie with just these 3.  There were also jokes poking fun at Schwarzenegger, Willis and Stallone's past films as well as Norris's "Facts" popularity that were fun in a way that didn't pull you out of the movie you were watching (though, the Terminator ones did become overdone and corny).

     Overall, I think I liked the story more.  Whether that has to do with new writers, a new director bringing it to the screen or some other factor, I don't know.  The only problem I found with the movie was the scene where, not to give too much away, the Expendables lower their weapons in a hostage situation.  It didn't feel right, particularly due to the opening scene in the original film.  Some might bemoan that with Jet Li's Yang not on this mission that, in his absence, the CIA cohort that Church forces on the team is also Asian, like some quota is being filled.  But, despite this, I found Nan Yu a welcomed addition as Maggie.

     Now, for the 3rd installment of the series, all they need to do is add Steven Seagal to the roster…Kurt Russell, Mel Gibson and Harrison Ford would be kind of cool too.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Total Recall (2012)


TAKE 1: One Mans Opinion
…because film is largely subjective
 

by Frederick William Springer III
 

Total Recall
Release Date:  3 August 2012                                                              Runtime:  118 Minutes              
Review Date:  2 October 2012                                                              Rating:  3 (of 6)
 

     The Total Recall remake stands on its own two feet but falls short of the original.

     I recently (within the last 6 months) rewatched the Arnold Schwarzenegger version and, 20 years later, it still holds up as a great flick.  In preparation for the upcoming reboot, I also read the short story the original was loosely based upon, "We Can Remember It For You Wholesale," by Philip K. Dick.  The story, only about 20 pages in length, probably wouldn't translate well on the big screen, particularly the ending, which might work better as an episode of the Twilight Zone.  So the new isn't any more grounded in the source than the original, this really being a new interpretation of the film only, keeping many of the new characters created in that incarnation.

     One thing a big deal had been made of was keeping the three-breasted woman of the 1990 film.  However, this served absolutely no purpose here and was completely out of place in this version.  In the Schwarzenegger movie, she was encountered on Mars, where Mutants were commonplace and so, it was at least a somewhat feasible genetic defect within the parameters of the story.  Here, Colin Farrell runs into her on Earth, where no such mutants have developed.  (And, in fact, none of this movie takes place on Mars at all.)

     The acting was good, no problems there.  The role of Lori was much expanded from Kate Beckinsale's Sharon Stone counterpart with good results.  The premise was alright and it was action-packed, maybe more so than the original.  However, I think the element of fun present in the original was absent here, which made this less interesting or, at least, less engaging (both on the level of a comparison and, more importantly, as a standalone film).

     Also, probably a production design choice to convey societal despair and the dullness that made Colin Farrell's Quaid want to escape his life by going to Rekall, the overall color scheme, wardrobe and architectural structures were so dull, uniform and ominous that nothing really stood out or popped on the screen.  Again, less interesting, less engaging.

     While not a complete bomb, for a more satisfying experience I'd recommend cutting 5 minutes off your viewing time and watching the original instead.

Brave


TAKE 1: One Mans Opinion
…because film is largely subjective
 

by Frederick William Springer III
 
Brave
Release Date:  22 June 2012                                                                Runtime:  100 Minutes              
Review Date:  2 October 2012                                                              Rating:  4 (of 6)
     I must say that there was a disparity between the movie I thought I was going to see based on the trailer and the actual film itself when I sat down and watched Brave.  Normally, I'd give kudos for this bit of misleading presentation, annoyed when all the good parts are shown in the trailer leaving no real reason to see the piece in its entirety. 
     But here, instead of being an interesting adventure of a young girl who defies being a party to an arranged marriage and seeks her own way in the world, it is really about a misshapen spell that can tear Princess Merida's family apart and her trying to rectify it.  Which, too, could work well, but I found the results of the spell a little hokey.
     That being said, I think the Pixar fanatic crowd will love it nonetheless, though I myself would rate it in the lower half of the Pixar motion picture library.  It goes without saying that the animation and graphic design are all fantastically done, candy for the eyes, as we've become accustomed to expect.  And, as has become the norm with many Pixar films, Brave does have its moments where the heartstrings are successfully pulled, too.