Sunday, August 12, 2012

Katy Perry: Part of Me


TAKE 1: One Mans Opinion

…because film is largely subjective

 

by Frederick William Springer III
 

Katy Perry: Part of Me
Release Date:  5 July 2012                                                                      Runtime:  93 Minutes              
Review Date:  12 August 2012                                                                Rating:  4.5 (of 6)
 

     Evaluated as a documentary, an inside look at the person behind the musician, Part of Me delivers, though that isn't to say it still isn't a publicity, marketing tool to package her "live" music to fans as well.  This isn't on par with a more in depth look provided by 45 minute biographies done by cable networks that usually do this kind of thing, so if that's what you're looking for you should look elsewhere.

     Going in, I didn’t know very much about Katy at all other than that I liked her songs, thought she had a fun personality (conveyed in music videos and interviews) and that she was cute.  Based off that, though I may have learned more about her, it still can be summed up in a paragraph:

     Though she seemingly exploded onto the scene, there were many years that Katy was working hard before that first firework was finally set off.  She was raised by preachers (her first album was actually gospel music) and maintains close contact with her family--her sister even working for her, accompanying her every step of the way.  She loves her Grandma and I can only imagine the feelings of joy Katy must have when her Grandma is in the audience observing the success she has achieved and what she has grown up to become.  Katy works hard to achieve the goals she sets for herself in all aspects of her life.  And she is best friends with The Riches actress Shannon Woodward.

     Now, do you have to see the movie to learn all this?  No, obviously I was able to convey it to you in a matter of less than a minute (depending on the speed you read).  I'm sure her mega-fans and cyber-stalkers already knew this as well.

     What I can say is that the fun personality shines through but she is humanized too.  She has bad days but doesn't pull any diva moves--she still goes to work like any other mere mortal.  She's shown stripped of the wigs, costumes and make up, how she'd look as an ordinary woman rather than superstar (and you just might not recognize her on the street).  However, other than her cover of "I Wanna Be Somebody," her "live" music isn't as pleasing to my ear as the versions I know and love.

     And, it being produced by her own company, one does wonder how slanted the perspective presented potentially is.  My own account of Katy backstage at an award show where she was a presenter--pretty in person, striking eyes as she looked into my own.  But I also happen to know, minutes before the show was set to film, she sent in last minute changes of her dialogue that had to be rushed to all appropriate parties (no other presenter pulled that).  So how much of that goes on not shown is anyone's guess here.

     I'd say, ultimately, it's a movie for fans because she cherishes them and it shows.  Anyone with a remote curiosity or interest in her, there are worse ways to spend 90 minutes.

     [On a side note, I love how her assistant on tour says it's her first job in the music industry.  So many people vying for positions in the entertainment realm, including those with experience in their respective industries and/or position, something--mind you--that is normally required to be an assistant to a celebrity, and here she is her first job in the industry.  It makes me wonder who she's related to or dating.  Can you sense bitterness? Haha.  But that's a tangent for a whole other editorial…]

Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter


TAKE 1: One Mans Opinion
…because film is largely subjective
 
by Frederick William Springer III

 

Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
Release Date:  22 June 2012                                                                 Runtime:  105 Minutes              
Review Date:  12 August 2012                                                              Rating:  2.5 (of 6)
 

Going in, I had no other expectation than the concept being so ridiculous that it may be so bad it's good.  This was not the case.

I put aside the fact that it's based on historical figures and regarded them as any other character in a work of fiction.  While I successfully divorced the two in my mind, it ultimately did not help.  Is it that the story itself was dull and the characters not compelling?  I don't know.

I will say that the screen version of Mary Todd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) was easy on the eyes, something that can't be said for her real-life counterpart, obviously glamoured up for Hollywood.  The same can be said of Abe (Benjamin Walker), though they did use make up when he was older to make him closer resemble the Lincoln we all know.

Some of the special effects as applied to scenery were cool.